<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Relevant Links Are Irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html</link>
	<description>The SEO Blog with attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Myth of the Relevant Link &#124; Virante Orange Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-35309</link>
		<dc:creator>The Myth of the Relevant Link &#124; Virante Orange Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-35309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I am by no means the only SEO to doubt the veracity of these claims (here is Michael Martinez and Julie Joyce on the issue in 2007), but despite their reasoned arguments, the myth continues to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am by no means the only SEO to doubt the veracity of these claims (here is Michael Martinez and Julie Joyce on the issue in 2007), but despite their reasoned arguments, the myth continues to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabil</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24886</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would one want an irrelevant link?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would one want an irrelevant link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24267</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can control to a certain extent where your content goes and where you receive backlinks but ultimately if a webmaster chooses to link to you then its up to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can control to a certain extent where your content goes and where you receive backlinks but ultimately if a webmaster chooses to link to you then its up to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Design</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-17177</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-17177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great article. In terms of SEO, link building and the relevance of links should be implemented using common sense. Using keywords and links that are not specific to your website, are simply not worth having.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. In terms of SEO, link building and the relevance of links should be implemented using common sense. Using keywords and links that are not specific to your website, are simply not worth having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chris...excellent point. It really is a tricky situation isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris&#8230;excellent point. It really is a tricky situation isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7357</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree completely, but there are ways to value a link&#039;s relevance that have nothing to do with the actual content. What?

You go a step deeper, look at the links into the site linking in to you.   The more &quot;relevant&quot; they are to your text, the more relevant your link is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely, but there are ways to value a link&#8217;s relevance that have nothing to do with the actual content. What?</p>
<p>You go a step deeper, look at the links into the site linking in to you.   The more &#8220;relevant&#8221; they are to your text, the more relevant your link is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-5569</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-5569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brian (aka my new best friend)...I have recently been chastized (see, I AM American) by Lyndonman about my piss poor stumbling skills. You can find me there, though, at Jajoyce2. It&#039;s horrible, really, how little I use this.

Wait, did you call me long-winded? Hahahahaha.

I&#039;ll gladly be deported. I could stand to be closer to the gay kilt shop at Covent Garden.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian (aka my new best friend)&#8230;I have recently been chastized (see, I AM American) by Lyndonman about my piss poor stumbling skills. You can find me there, though, at Jajoyce2. It&#8217;s horrible, really, how little I use this.</p>
<p>Wait, did you call me long-winded? Hahahahaha.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll gladly be deported. I could stand to be closer to the gay kilt shop at Covent Garden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-5568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie,

How do I find you on StumbleUpon? Anyone that werks The Clash and The Sex Pistols into there posts is someone I want to follow. Even if the babbling side of your posts are a bit long-winded.

I sure hope you&#039;re English. Any American thinking The Clash or The Sex Pistols is a better band than The Ramones or The Misfits should have to be deported GB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie,</p>
<p>How do I find you on StumbleUpon? Anyone that werks The Clash and The Sex Pistols into there posts is someone I want to follow. Even if the babbling side of your posts are a bit long-winded.</p>
<p>I sure hope you&#8217;re English. Any American thinking The Clash or The Sex Pistols is a better band than The Ramones or The Misfits should have to be deported GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. I always wondered about this one. To think that google would be less than honest. What is this world coming to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I always wondered about this one. To think that google would be less than honest. What is this world coming to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Building this week (05-10) &#124; Wiep.net</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Building this week (05-10) &#124; Wiep.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is a much better discussion; it&#8217;s the debate of quality links. While Julie Joyce explains Why Relevant Links are Irrelevant, Debra Mastaler adds that a link is Sometimes Just a Damn Link. The third woman in this list is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a much better discussion; it&#8217;s the debate of quality links. While Julie Joyce explains Why Relevant Links are Irrelevant, Debra Mastaler adds that a link is Sometimes Just a Damn Link. The third woman in this list is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
