Comments on: Google on the grapevine… http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html The SEO Blog with attitude Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:47:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Too Much Trouble « That’s This World Over http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html/comment-page-1#comment-1097 Too Much Trouble « That’s This World Over Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:43:52 +0000 http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html#comment-1097 [...] what is the value of TMT (its not 42 or 88)? Well that depends on a number of factors such as 1- How long have I used product “A”; [...] [...] what is the value of TMT (its not 42 or 88)? Well that depends on a number of factors such as 1- How long have I used product “A”; [...]

]]> By: Julie Joyce http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html/comment-page-1#comment-886 Julie Joyce Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:41:47 +0000 http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html#comment-886 Good point Gene. I'd like to also mention that the song "88 Lines About 44 Women" mentions a "Julie" -- could that possibly be a coincidence? Good point Gene. I’d like to also mention that the song “88 Lines About 44 Women” mentions a “Julie” — could that possibly be a coincidence?

]]> By: Gene Wicker Jr http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html/comment-page-1#comment-884 Gene Wicker Jr Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:17:27 +0000 http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html#comment-884 Like Julie and Tom 88 seems like a strange number for a limit. Other than the song "88 Lines About 44 Women", I can think of no case where 88 comes up as breakpoint... but it is Google and maybe its something that popped our of their algorithm as a magic number (like 42 to Douglas Adams). As for the domain strategy it would seem like a nice marketing ploy by the registrars to entice people to renew for longer periods (much as anti-virus vendors always play up the latest & greatest virus attack i.e. its good for the bottom line). Like Julie and Tom 88 seems like a strange number for a limit. Other than the song “88 Lines About 44 Women”, I can think of no case where 88 comes up as breakpoint… but it is Google and maybe its something that popped our of their algorithm as a magic number (like 42 to Douglas Adams).

As for the domain strategy it would seem like a nice marketing ploy by the registrars to entice people to renew for longer periods (much as anti-virus vendors always play up the latest & greatest virus attack i.e. its good for the bottom line).

]]> By: Julie Joyce http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html/comment-page-1#comment-875 Julie Joyce Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:35:46 +0000 http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html#comment-875 Hey Anita...I agree with Tom (which is disagreeing with the 88 number issue.) I've never seen any evidence that that is the case. It sounds almost ridiculous enough to be true though. Regarding the domain registration terms, I have also heard that a 1 year only reg. won't seem serious to Google, that you're not looking for a long-term strategy so why should they bother? Again, I have seen no evidence of this personally but since we're talking about Google, it's definitely possible. Good questions! Hey Anita…I agree with Tom (which is disagreeing with the 88 number issue.) I’ve never seen any evidence that that is the case. It sounds almost ridiculous enough to be true though.

Regarding the domain registration terms, I have also heard that a 1 year only reg. won’t seem serious to Google, that you’re not looking for a long-term strategy so why should they bother? Again, I have seen no evidence of this personally but since we’re talking about Google, it’s definitely possible.

Good questions!

]]> By: Tom http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html/comment-page-1#comment-874 Tom Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:07:12 +0000 http://www.seo-chicks.com/250/google-on-the-grapevine.html#comment-874 1) I would disagree with this one, I highly doubt that there is a magic number X, and if you have more than 88 outbound links one a single domain then you are going to be penalised (you did mean to say outbound links right?). What I might consider is some kind of ratio of external links to internal links, so if 80% of the links on your site are external then a flag is raised. Even if this exists however, I wouldn't say it was a strong factor. 2) I have heard this too - but I've never seen evidence of it. It would make some kind of sense however, since if you ARE a serious business why are you only registering the domain for 1 year? I would always recommend registering for at least 5 but that's mainly just to avoid the domain registration slipping and you losing the domain. Just my $0.02 :-) 1) I would disagree with this one, I highly doubt that there is a magic number X, and if you have more than 88 outbound links one a single domain then you are going to be penalised (you did mean to say outbound links right?). What I might consider is some kind of ratio of external links to internal links, so if 80% of the links on your site are external then a flag is raised. Even if this exists however, I wouldn’t say it was a strong factor.

2) I have heard this too - but I’ve never seen evidence of it. It would make some kind of sense however, since if you ARE a serious business why are you only registering the domain for 1 year? I would always recommend registering for at least 5 but that’s mainly just to avoid the domain registration slipping and you losing the domain.

Just my $0.02 :-)

]]>