<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time To Count Your PageRank Losses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html</link>
	<description>The SEO Blog with attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Travel blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>Would you recommend us a good tool to check PR of all internal pages of our site?

Thanks in advance.

Syl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you recommend us a good tool to check PR of all internal pages of our site?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Syl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Ditlefsen</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Ditlefsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>lol Rebecca! Exactly, it&#039;s referring to the Friends episode when Monica leaves a message actually saying &quot;I&#039;m  breezy&quot; and everyone says you can&#039;t SAY you are breezy lol....Norwegian humour!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol Rebecca! Exactly, it&#8217;s referring to the Friends episode when Monica leaves a message actually saying &#8220;I&#8217;m  breezy&#8221; and everyone says you can&#8217;t SAY you are breezy lol&#8230;.Norwegian humour!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t SAY you&#039;re breezy, Lisa! That negates all breeziness! ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t SAY you&#8217;re breezy, Lisa! That negates all breeziness! ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surprise, Surprise. &#124; TaintedSong v10</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Surprise, Surprise. &#124; TaintedSong v10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-929</guid>
		<description>[...] Google is like one big jigsaw puzzle, which means that it&#8217;s just so hard to figure out. This SEO Chick brought up a really good point about it. But among the blog posts I&#8217;ve read about this topic, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google is like one big jigsaw puzzle, which means that it&#8217;s just so hard to figure out. This SEO Chick brought up a really good point about it. But among the blog posts I&#8217;ve read about this topic, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-927</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to believe isn&#039;t it? Scoundrels, all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe isn&#8217;t it? Scoundrels, all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imjuk</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>imjuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Imagine Google doing something this nasty this close to Christmas - they&#039;d never do that :p Anyone would think they&#039;re trying to maximise their revenue from Adwords in the run up to the festive season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine Google doing something this nasty this close to Christmas &#8211; they&#8217;d never do that :p Anyone would think they&#8217;re trying to maximise their revenue from Adwords in the run up to the festive season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-907</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about them giving plenty of warning...I still think that most people have bought links before, at least most major sites. I should say paid links are the current focus of Google&#039;s nonstop crackdown on optimization. 

I have not personally seen any correlation between PR and  SERP placement either. I think that site owners will see a decrease and immediately think they&#039;ll see decreased rankings. Whether or not that is true, I have no idea. I have never worked on a site that&#039;s experienced a decrease in PR. I HAVE worked on sites that were affected by the Florida update, and when the rankings fell those people spent a fortune in Google Adwords. It just seems like a convenient way for them to get you to spend some money with them. Then again, I can&#039;t imagine they could NEED more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about them giving plenty of warning&#8230;I still think that most people have bought links before, at least most major sites. I should say paid links are the current focus of Google&#8217;s nonstop crackdown on optimization. </p>
<p>I have not personally seen any correlation between PR and  SERP placement either. I think that site owners will see a decrease and immediately think they&#8217;ll see decreased rankings. Whether or not that is true, I have no idea. I have never worked on a site that&#8217;s experienced a decrease in PR. I HAVE worked on sites that were affected by the Florida update, and when the rankings fell those people spent a fortune in Google Adwords. It just seems like a convenient way for them to get you to spend some money with them. Then again, I can&#8217;t imagine they could NEED more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g1smd</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>g1smd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-906</guid>
		<description>*** Paid links become the next really dirty thing in SEO.  ***


Paid links have been dirty for a long time. Google gave people plenty warnings over the last 18 months or more to get out before the hammer fell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*** Paid links become the next really dirty thing in SEO.  ***</p>
<p>Paid links have been dirty for a long time. Google gave people plenty warnings over the last 18 months or more to get out before the hammer fell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizDev M</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>BizDev M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-903</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sites lose some of their “authority” and rush to spend more money in paid (Google) ads just to make a preemptive strike towards any potential loss of rankings and/or traffic.&#8221; </p>
<p>Curious, Julie &#8211; Have you seen a direct correlation between PR and SERP placement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boyd Clark Journal/Blog - Blog Archive &#187; Google Pagerank 6 to 4! and 0 to 3 or 4!</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boyd Clark Journal/Blog - Blog Archive &#187; Google Pagerank 6 to 4! and 0 to 3 or 4!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/251/time-to-count-your-pagerank-losses.html#comment-896</guid>
		<description>[...] Time To Count Your PageRank Losses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time To Count Your PageRank Losses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

