<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you don&#8217;t do perfect &#8211; do interesting!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html</link>
	<description>The SEO Blog with attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Chaperon</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/comment-page-1#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Chaperon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>Tony, good to see you here ;o) 

Marc, Tony, I agree completely. There has to be a cut-of line, especially with product features. In terms of how much users end up actually using would be down to a survey beforehand - that would be the only way to define how much is enough.

Julie, as usual, nothing escapes you... it was a close encounter nearly with their private parts, had they not finally agreed to turn around...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, good to see you here ;o) </p>
<p>Marc, Tony, I agree completely. There has to be a cut-of line, especially with product features. In terms of how much users end up actually using would be down to a survey beforehand &#8211; that would be the only way to define how much is enough.</p>
<p>Julie, as usual, nothing escapes you&#8230; it was a close encounter nearly with their private parts, had they not finally agreed to turn around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/comment-page-1#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>Um, Anita, isn&#039;t your avatar cleverly cropped so as not to show you with your hand over those stormtroopers&#039; private parts? Or am I wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Anita, isn&#8217;t your avatar cleverly cropped so as not to show you with your hand over those stormtroopers&#8217; private parts? Or am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Goodin</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/comment-page-1#comment-4031</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Goodin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html#comment-4031</guid>
		<description>I am glad to hear interesting is better than waiting for perfect.  We just launched our new web site with the concept that the user is looking for easy that works - not complex that takes forever to learn.

marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to hear interesting is better than waiting for perfect.  We just launched our new web site with the concept that the user is looking for easy that works &#8211; not complex that takes forever to learn.</p>
<p>marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/comment-page-1#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>tony spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>Well put Anita.  From a development standpoint I think its very important to remember that must keep your original offering simple. If you try to architect tons of cool features you&#039;ll only find yourself with a very distant deadline, frustrated programmers, and when you finally do launch your users will spend 90% of their time using one basic feature and may even be confused by the other features you&#039;ve built.  Keep it small, simple, and keep the lines of communication with your customer wide open so you can quickly react to their needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put Anita.  From a development standpoint I think its very important to remember that must keep your original offering simple. If you try to architect tons of cool features you&#8217;ll only find yourself with a very distant deadline, frustrated programmers, and when you finally do launch your users will spend 90% of their time using one basic feature and may even be confused by the other features you&#8217;ve built.  Keep it small, simple, and keep the lines of communication with your customer wide open so you can quickly react to their needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html/comment-page-1#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/383/if-you-dont-do-perfect-do-interesting.html#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>I think this is true for people as well...perfection is quite overrated anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is true for people as well&#8230;perfection is quite overrated anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
