<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Actual USEFUL Niche Engine? Can It Be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html</link>
	<description>The SEO Blog with attitude</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html/comment-page-1#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>Doug!! Thanks for your comment. It's fantastic to get some info from the source...and thanks for pointing me to the plugin bit. I will say that so far, Able Grape is the only niche engine that's appealing to me, but I'm a huge wine fan. I like your point about not trying to compete with large engines actually...just making something good for a select group. That's a very valid point that I didn't bring up in my post, so thanks for that one. And good luck with this!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug!! Thanks for your comment. It&#8217;s fantastic to get some info from the source&#8230;and thanks for pointing me to the plugin bit. I will say that so far, Able Grape is the only niche engine that&#8217;s appealing to me, but I&#8217;m a huge wine fan. I like your point about not trying to compete with large engines actually&#8230;just making something good for a select group. That&#8217;s a very valid point that I didn&#8217;t bring up in my post, so thanks for that one. And good luck with this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html/comment-page-1#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>Hi Julie,

Wow! SEO interest already, I must have read my traffic numbers wrong ;-)

We don't have a toolbar as such, but we do support plugins on Firefox and IE 7. 

See:
http://www.ablegrape.com/en/help.html#faq9

As to your other points: yep, it's a niche engine. It was originally intended for professional users, or at least, lets call them "passionate consumers" (i.e. wine geeks). To that end, it was designed to make things faster for repeated use, on the premise that a user who needs to find good wine information frequently doesn't mind spending a few minutes learning something a little (hopefully not too) different if it will save them many hours in the long run. That's the premise, anyway; only time will tell if it's a good one.

Not sure about the fate of small search engines vs. Google and Yahoo! (big three? is there a third? ;-) I do know that for my needs neither of those search engines was remotely useful, and I'm a power searcher. But I'm not trying to conquer the world, just make something useful for a small set of people, and hopefully eke out paying the bills. It's more of a self-funded labor of love than a VC-backed pie-in-the-sky sort of thing.

Cheers,
d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julie,</p>
<p>Wow! SEO interest already, I must have read my traffic numbers wrong <img src='http://www.seo-chicks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have a toolbar as such, but we do support plugins on Firefox and IE 7. </p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://www.ablegrape.com/en/help.html#faq9" rel="nofollow">http://www.ablegrape.com/en/help.html#faq9</a></p>
<p>As to your other points: yep, it&#8217;s a niche engine. It was originally intended for professional users, or at least, lets call them &#8220;passionate consumers&#8221; (i.e. wine geeks). To that end, it was designed to make things faster for repeated use, on the premise that a user who needs to find good wine information frequently doesn&#8217;t mind spending a few minutes learning something a little (hopefully not too) different if it will save them many hours in the long run. That&#8217;s the premise, anyway; only time will tell if it&#8217;s a good one.</p>
<p>Not sure about the fate of small search engines vs. Google and Yahoo! (big three? is there a third? <img src='http://www.seo-chicks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I do know that for my needs neither of those search engines was remotely useful, and I&#8217;m a power searcher. But I&#8217;m not trying to conquer the world, just make something useful for a small set of people, and hopefully eke out paying the bills. It&#8217;s more of a self-funded labor of love than a VC-backed pie-in-the-sky sort of thing.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html/comment-page-1#comment-5764</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/422/an-actual-useful-niche-engine-can-it-be.html#comment-5764</guid>
		<description>Yes, everyone, I do realize how useless those images are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, everyone, I do realize how useless those images are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
