<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Listening To Matt Cutts Is A Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html</link>
	<description>The SEO Blog with attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasha Cillis</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-34929</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasha Cillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-34929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ, your example of how to analyse a security hole and produce a win-win solution is brilliant. It&#039;s akin to the police inflitrating a crime ring to befriend the crook who cracks a car&#039;s security code with ease, if you don&#039;t understand it, you&#039;re never going to get anywhere. The carmakers take this onboard, just as the search engines do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, your example of how to analyse a security hole and produce a win-win solution is brilliant. It&#8217;s akin to the police inflitrating a crime ring to befriend the crook who cracks a car&#8217;s security code with ease, if you don&#8217;t understand it, you&#8217;re never going to get anywhere. The carmakers take this onboard, just as the search engines do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa Perlet</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-22438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Perlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-22438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The courage you gave me was to do a find replace that resulted on over 6,000 rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#039;s being removed within my site of almost 500 pages - in - well you know computers- five minutes my computer undid months of my feeble human work work.

At first- at fear I&#039;d maybe want to reverse it later- if Google changed their mind- or Baidu took over- etc - I tried to turn it to edit find replace &quot;rel follow&quot;.

Then research brought to light that was a tactic blog spammers were using- and it was ineffective and futile as only in a meta tag can you have follow as an attribute. So - if I did that I would have red flagged my own site even though- once again- I was trying to do the right thing. Hmmmm.

So- I stared at my computer screen (my buddy - his name is &quot;Flat Face&quot;) - and the site I and Flat Face have built heart and soul together for almost a year every day- morning and night- and I did the ultimate find replace- I told Flat Face to pull ALL rel no follow refs.

No turning back - well a lot of work to turn back- nothings final I guess.

I thought of THREE things while I opened the flood gates of well deserved human approved link juice and then instructed Flat Face to FTP over 500 html pages stripped of their no follow tags.

The first thing I I thought about was physics- and how I suck at math - I thought about the flow of electricity - how it doesn&#039;t flow if shut down at any one point. Anywhere. Just shuts down. I suck at math - but even I understand that. (Link Juice)

I thought about how hard it was for me- when I had my first website ever - out in deep space- and no-one would link to me bc I was a PR N/A and then finally someone did! And the whole web opened up for me - I was a part of it.

Most importantly- I remembered- being three years old- in the early 80s - sitting at my princess desk- with my Vic 20 or maybe it was a commodore 64 - logged in on &quot;COMPUSERVE&quot; - this is pre- internet. I remember the point- everything is supposed to be interconnected - like a WEB.

Like a WORLD WIDE WEB. Doesn&#039;t anybody remember that? It&#039;s supposed to be CONNECTED.

So - Flat Face and I FTP&#039;d over a huge shift rel anchor text/ SEO to our site we have built together for almost a year. 

And - I know- you should never be that dramatic. But we did it. And I&#039;m watching my live woopra traffic reports - and its going great. So far. Traffic and rankings are picking up.

It&#039;s almost like my PR sculpted site was artery clogged and now the blood is flowing again?

So Far- I can recommend - open the flood gates, get the electricity flowing- open the world wide web BACK UP! 

Ditch the rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on all hyperlinks you have the time to review yourself. If they are valid- spread the link love. 

Remember - www means - world wide web! ;-)

Alisa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The courage you gave me was to do a find replace that resulted on over 6,000 rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;&#8216;s being removed within my site of almost 500 pages &#8211; in &#8211; well you know computers- five minutes my computer undid months of my feeble human work work.</p>
<p>At first- at fear I&#8217;d maybe want to reverse it later- if Google changed their mind- or Baidu took over- etc &#8211; I tried to turn it to edit find replace &#8220;rel follow&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then research brought to light that was a tactic blog spammers were using- and it was ineffective and futile as only in a meta tag can you have follow as an attribute. So &#8211; if I did that I would have red flagged my own site even though- once again- I was trying to do the right thing. Hmmmm.</p>
<p>So- I stared at my computer screen (my buddy &#8211; his name is &#8220;Flat Face&#8221;) &#8211; and the site I and Flat Face have built heart and soul together for almost a year every day- morning and night- and I did the ultimate find replace- I told Flat Face to pull ALL rel no follow refs.</p>
<p>No turning back &#8211; well a lot of work to turn back- nothings final I guess.</p>
<p>I thought of THREE things while I opened the flood gates of well deserved human approved link juice and then instructed Flat Face to FTP over 500 html pages stripped of their no follow tags.</p>
<p>The first thing I I thought about was physics- and how I suck at math &#8211; I thought about the flow of electricity &#8211; how it doesn&#8217;t flow if shut down at any one point. Anywhere. Just shuts down. I suck at math &#8211; but even I understand that. (Link Juice)</p>
<p>I thought about how hard it was for me- when I had my first website ever &#8211; out in deep space- and no-one would link to me bc I was a PR N/A and then finally someone did! And the whole web opened up for me &#8211; I was a part of it.</p>
<p>Most importantly- I remembered- being three years old- in the early 80s &#8211; sitting at my princess desk- with my Vic 20 or maybe it was a commodore 64 &#8211; logged in on &#8220;COMPUSERVE&#8221; &#8211; this is pre- internet. I remember the point- everything is supposed to be interconnected &#8211; like a WEB.</p>
<p>Like a WORLD WIDE WEB. Doesn&#8217;t anybody remember that? It&#8217;s supposed to be CONNECTED.</p>
<p>So &#8211; Flat Face and I FTP&#8217;d over a huge shift rel anchor text/ SEO to our site we have built together for almost a year. </p>
<p>And &#8211; I know- you should never be that dramatic. But we did it. And I&#8217;m watching my live woopra traffic reports &#8211; and its going great. So far. Traffic and rankings are picking up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost like my PR sculpted site was artery clogged and now the blood is flowing again?</p>
<p>So Far- I can recommend &#8211; open the flood gates, get the electricity flowing- open the world wide web BACK UP! </p>
<p>Ditch the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; on all hyperlinks you have the time to review yourself. If they are valid- spread the link love. </p>
<p>Remember &#8211; www means &#8211; world wide web! <img src='http://www.seo-chicks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Alisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa Perlet</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-22436</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Perlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 00:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-22436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Donna- you truly ARE dazlin&#039;. I support my family online with our various websites- and my &quot;Jewel&quot; website- the one all my hopes and dreams are invested in (and hard work every day!) I followed to the letter- everything I thought Google was telling me to do - tons of great content (hard work) followed up with no follow sculpting. Internally to my own site and to others I was linking out to.

No matter how hard I worked- or how much unique content our site had- our best intentions - how much we grew- our PR climbed but we had NO traffic from Google?

Yet my other sites that were not PR sculpted with nofollow were thriving with traffic.

I started to suspect the no follow tag after exhausting all other posibilities. I was ABOUT to cross to the dark side until I read your article.

I had read many SEO opinions- but when I read your article- it gave me the guts as a fellow SEO Chic- I opened the flood gates on our site - pulled ALL the no-follows and within 1 DAY- we finally were sub-categorized by Google. I have tried to earn that honor for a year- we finally got sub category links under our domain name. Eight of them! ;-) I&#039;m not talking indent! I&#039;m talking eight extra sub category divisions!

The no-follow idea was great for blog comments but for those of us that build websites and intentionally put links in? 

If I intentionally put a link in- it&#039;s been human approved, SEO chic approved actually! and the link is there for my visitors. Which is the point- the visitors.

Thanks for your article - you really helped me - to help my visitors - and to help spread the link love as it is meant to be spread (Not hoarded).

You also helped me to trust MY instincts again - as opposed to what I read that was supposed to be dogma. I agree with you - I prefer doing this SERP thing in the dark! Letting my website analytics and visitor traffic reports tell me what to do and what I need to change.

Thanks!
Alisa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Donna- you truly ARE dazlin&#8217;. I support my family online with our various websites- and my &#8220;Jewel&#8221; website- the one all my hopes and dreams are invested in (and hard work every day!) I followed to the letter- everything I thought Google was telling me to do &#8211; tons of great content (hard work) followed up with no follow sculpting. Internally to my own site and to others I was linking out to.</p>
<p>No matter how hard I worked- or how much unique content our site had- our best intentions &#8211; how much we grew- our PR climbed but we had NO traffic from Google?</p>
<p>Yet my other sites that were not PR sculpted with nofollow were thriving with traffic.</p>
<p>I started to suspect the no follow tag after exhausting all other posibilities. I was ABOUT to cross to the dark side until I read your article.</p>
<p>I had read many SEO opinions- but when I read your article- it gave me the guts as a fellow SEO Chic- I opened the flood gates on our site &#8211; pulled ALL the no-follows and within 1 DAY- we finally were sub-categorized by Google. I have tried to earn that honor for a year- we finally got sub category links under our domain name. Eight of them! <img src='http://www.seo-chicks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m not talking indent! I&#8217;m talking eight extra sub category divisions!</p>
<p>The no-follow idea was great for blog comments but for those of us that build websites and intentionally put links in? </p>
<p>If I intentionally put a link in- it&#8217;s been human approved, SEO chic approved actually! and the link is there for my visitors. Which is the point- the visitors.</p>
<p>Thanks for your article &#8211; you really helped me &#8211; to help my visitors &#8211; and to help spread the link love as it is meant to be spread (Not hoarded).</p>
<p>You also helped me to trust MY instincts again &#8211; as opposed to what I read that was supposed to be dogma. I agree with you &#8211; I prefer doing this SERP thing in the dark! Letting my website analytics and visitor traffic reports tell me what to do and what I need to change.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Alisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-22249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-22249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be nice if we really could write for our readers and not Google.The problem with that is we wouldn&#039;t have any readers.There are sites with great content that don&#039;t even show up on Google&#039;s radar.
On the other hand, it is amazing to come across sites that are all ads and no real content,yet have a high page rank.
For now we will have to continue aiming to please Google as there is little choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if we really could write for our readers and not Google.The problem with that is we wouldn&#8217;t have any readers.There are sites with great content that don&#8217;t even show up on Google&#8217;s radar.<br />
On the other hand, it is amazing to come across sites that are all ads and no real content,yet have a high page rank.<br />
For now we will have to continue aiming to please Google as there is little choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17582</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classic article. I rarely pay attention to nofollow anyways .. i still think their is the benefit of getting a clickthrough and even though PR is not passed it still counts as an inbound link. Build for your user and not for Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic article. I rarely pay attention to nofollow anyways .. i still think their is the benefit of getting a clickthrough and even though PR is not passed it still counts as an inbound link. Build for your user and not for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSL</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17518</link>
		<dc:creator>NSL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the great article. I don&#039;t believe this G Matt Cut. He misleads the people. He advices something but google does sth totally different to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great article. I don&#8217;t believe this G Matt Cut. He misleads the people. He advices something but google does sth totally different to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17423</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donna,
I like what you have to say. I like how you wrote this article for you user, and I especially like the fact that you are willing to say what others won&#039;t. Now with all that being said, I have three web sites, all of which are small. One of them I have is strictly for information to consumers, anti-corporation. Two of my three site were running a PR of 5, until a few days ago. I got dinged. I might not use the best advertising platform, but I also don&#039;t make more than 100 dollars a month about ($7.00 from google adsense). I find it frustrating that even when I did play by the google rules, I was less successful than I am now. I continue to grow my sites as best as possible, but no matter the approach, I get punished by google. Not looking for sympathy, or help hence the reason I didn&#039;t put any url in my name. Just voicing my 2 opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna,<br />
I like what you have to say. I like how you wrote this article for you user, and I especially like the fact that you are willing to say what others won&#8217;t. Now with all that being said, I have three web sites, all of which are small. One of them I have is strictly for information to consumers, anti-corporation. Two of my three site were running a PR of 5, until a few days ago. I got dinged. I might not use the best advertising platform, but I also don&#8217;t make more than 100 dollars a month about ($7.00 from google adsense). I find it frustrating that even when I did play by the google rules, I was less successful than I am now. I continue to grow my sites as best as possible, but no matter the approach, I get punished by google. Not looking for sympathy, or help hence the reason I didn&#8217;t put any url in my name. Just voicing my 2 opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17378</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the explanation.

My lesson is to focus on building great sites that people like and support alternate methods for arriving at the content. The more methods the better.

If there is one lesson we can learn for this we suffer  when there is lack of diversity in the competitive landscape.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the explanation.</p>
<p>My lesson is to focus on building great sites that people like and support alternate methods for arriving at the content. The more methods the better.</p>
<p>If there is one lesson we can learn for this we suffer  when there is lack of diversity in the competitive landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomalab</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17377</link>
		<dc:creator>nomalab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@LowLevel: not sure when / where / if Matt Cutts has &quot;specifically told us that nofollowing our own internal links would be a good way to sculpt our link juice&quot;, but in his SEOMoz comment on August 29, 2007 he said it *could* be used for sculpting:

I think saying people &quot;should be&quot; using nofollow is a bit strong. More like people can use it for internal links if they&#039;re power-user-y enough to want to sculpt PageRank flow within their site at the link level. But I&#039;d say that most regular webmasters don&#039;t need to worry about link-level PageRank flow within their site. I think saying &quot;power users and webmasters should be employing on their sites&quot; overstates it a little. It&#039;s available if you want to get into that much fine-grained control.

Source: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/questions-answers-with-googles-spam-guru#jtc33536]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LowLevel: not sure when / where / if Matt Cutts has &#8220;specifically told us that nofollowing our own internal links would be a good way to sculpt our link juice&#8221;, but in his SEOMoz comment on August 29, 2007 he said it *could* be used for sculpting:</p>
<p>I think saying people &#8220;should be&#8221; using nofollow is a bit strong. More like people can use it for internal links if they&#8217;re power-user-y enough to want to sculpt PageRank flow within their site at the link level. But I&#8217;d say that most regular webmasters don&#8217;t need to worry about link-level PageRank flow within their site. I think saying &#8220;power users and webmasters should be employing on their sites&#8221; overstates it a little. It&#8217;s available if you want to get into that much fine-grained control.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/questions-answers-with-googles-spam-guru#jtc33536" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/questions-answers-with-googles-spam-guru#jtc33536</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zanakin</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-chicks.com/917/why-listening-to-matt-cutts-is-a-bad-idea.html#comment-17375</link>
		<dc:creator>zanakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-chicks.com/?p=917#comment-17375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think about that:

1) Wikipedia is a Knol (Google) competitor.
2) Wikipedia success is only based on amazing SEO (sorry Google) performance.
3) Wikipedia always uses nofollow for external links, this technique has created a &quot;SEO black hole&quot;.

Conclusion: the new nofollow rules will reduce the  Wikipedia strength and should let more space for other knowledge website, so Knol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about that:</p>
<p>1) Wikipedia is a Knol (Google) competitor.<br />
2) Wikipedia success is only based on amazing SEO (sorry Google) performance.<br />
3) Wikipedia always uses nofollow for external links, this technique has created a &#8220;SEO black hole&#8221;.</p>
<p>Conclusion: the new nofollow rules will reduce the  Wikipedia strength and should let more space for other knowledge website, so Knol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
